I… am still on the fence about this last year in movies, honestly. That 2011 was the year I started hyperactively blogging everything I saw (and thus seeing a lot) has helped me realize that 2011 was not a year where I actually cared about a lot of movies. (I suppose extending that into things I’ve seen so far this year, as that’s the Oscar Year.) I mean, the only three movies I bought were comic-based/book-based/hyperstylized action drama fantasy insanities (Sucker Punch, X-Men: First Class, and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2) and the only other one I gave a damn about was Hugo (I really should buy that, too). If we’re counting this year, too, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. Lots of feelings. I’m looking at my post from last year’s Oscars, and not a single movie that I discussed gave me ambivalent feelings. Feelings of “it’s good, but not great” or “I knew it was good, I just… didn’t care.” That was the overwhelming consensus this year, I’m afraid.
The Artist (Best Picture, Actor in a Leading Role [Jean Dujardin], Directing, Costume Design, Music [Original Score])
I just. I might be unsophisticated and lame, but while I recognized this as a good movie, yes, and Dujardin’s performance was good, and the costumes were good (I do like that era), and the music was good (it had to be, to carry a film), it just… didn’t stay with me. I think I expect too much from movies. I expect them to make my heart hurt (whether from sad or from extreme happy). I expect them to, I don’t know, make me feel something. Something. Other than “oh, well, okay.”
Beginners (Actor in a Supporting Role [Christopher Plummer])
I have mentioned my feelings about this movie briefly, yes. I have acknowledged how I approve of Christopher Plummer’s winning ALL the awards for his performance. I will take this moment to say that: this movie actually made me feel something. I gave a damn about the characters (all of them) and I loved that, while happy and sometimes whimsical, in a milder Amelie kind of way, it wasn’t perfect. The ending wasn’t a happy ending. I have nowhere else to say that, and realize that I never did, but since a lot of the reason that things otherwise nominated (The Descendants, for example) seem to be, at least in part, because they have that “real life story with an imperfect but not terrible ending” — this had that. And I liked them, all of them, a lot more.
The Descendants (Writing [Adapted Screenplay])
I saw another blogger, Deadline‘s much more important Nikki Finke, saying this: “while I’m at it, the Academy has its head up its ass for not nominating the final Harry Potter movie.” I get behind this as a fangirl, because I have been one since I was eleven and they were eleven, it’s just a part of who I am, but I also get behind this in a more technical way. I had many issues with the adaptations of the Harry Potter books into movies back in the day, when I was younger and I’d read the books more recently. But not because they were bad movies. Because I was nitpicky and I wanted more of my favorite details. I’ve been on a rewatch spree lately, though, and I can honestly say that it doesn’t matter to me anymore. Are there things I still want (Tonks [Natalie Tena] and Lupin [David Thewlis])? Are there things I still think were a waste of time (the copious gratuitous nature shots in Prisoner of Azkaban)? Yes. Are they still very solid, very good movies that stay true to the spirit of things? Yes. And was the adaptation of Deathly Hallows perfect and wonderful, even with details missing because they’d been missing before and continuity and time? Yes.
Oh, and I guess that The Descendants was a passable choice, even if I would have given this one to something else (Hugo, probably, just because I wanted it to win everything). I haven’t read the book, and never will, but it didn’t suck. It was good, I suppose. So.
The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (Film Editing)
I don’t really know how to judge this category, but since I really did like this movie a lot, I’m good with this. They didn’t even have a score nod (I guess since The Social Network got one and won it last year, it would have been too much) but I would have wanted that, too. (Note to self: buy this album now.) And I knew Rooney Mara wouldn’t win. I didn’t expect her to. I’m just happy she got nominated. But I still got to stare at her a few times, so I won’t complain. Nope.
The Help (Actress in a Supporting Role [Octavia Spencer])
Okay. Sure.
Hugo (Art Direction, Cinematography, Sound Editing, Sound Mixing, Visual Effects)
As has already been made abundantly clear: this was my Best Picture choice. Out of immense affection for it, out of a feeling that it was a completely solid film. It actually made me feel things. It did the “love letter to cinema” thing that seemed to be the point of this year’s ceremony (and is always good). It had a really good story. It had really good characters. It had beautiful everything-it-won-for, yes, but I wanted it to win so much more. And I feel like people didn’t know what to make of it. People thought it was just a kids’ movie, maybe, or they thought it was too weird, or it was too techie-something. (Which is funny, considering that some movies that have been just techie have gotten buzz as being Great Films for that very reason.) But it wasn’t. It was a movie about kids, but it was a movie about adults too. It was a movie about kids that weren’t too stupid or too, too precocious (I mean, they were precocious, but not in the painful way). It was a movie that was strange, but strange is good. It was a movie that had a lot of visual effects and hyperrealism, but this assisted the story. It was a book that was, in part, about a filmmaker’s robot, for crying out loud. Of course there were going to be special effects. It took place in a world that wasn’t quite our own, stylistically, but it was never distracting. It was beautiful. It was a fairy tale for grown-ups that happened to have children and robots in it, but it was brilliant.
The Iron Lady (Actress in a Leading Role [Meryl Streep], Makeup)
I have not seen this. But really. From what I can see, the makeup had very good street makeup, very good age makeup, very good fake teeth for Meryl Streep. But again that is not the same as transforming people into convincing-looking goblins or something. Or, barring that, transforming Glenn Close and Janet Teers into semi-convincing pseudomen.
Midnight in Paris (Writing [Original Screenplay])
I don’t know what I would have actually done in this category. I can’t, with honesty, do the thing that a lot of people have and say “oh, Bridesmaids,” because I… have unresolved feelings about that movie. But I do appreciate that it was women being funny for a while, and that was good. I didn’t see two of the nominees. (I’d never even heard of Margin Call.) But I don’t really know if this sits well with me, either. Woody Allen can write Woody Allen, I feel like. Here, he had the one “complex, artistic” male protagonist, and a cast of shallow supporting characters. All of the women (and most of the men) may as well have been paper dolls. It wasn’t exactly predictable, from the beginning, but once it got going I could see through it. It was very pretty, but it wasn’t… again, I didn’t feel anything.
The Muppets (Music [Original Song])
In short, YES.
Thank you, Academy, for not giving any of these awards to War Horse or Moneyball, which were, again, serviceable films, but not the best in any of their categories. No thanks for not putting on a great show (other bloggers discuss this much better than I could, so I won’t).
–your fangirl heroine.