Tag Archives: west side story

Theatre Thursday :: examples of the musical theatre Bechdel Test? (M-Z)

23 May

Same rules as last week.

Mamma Mia! by… ABBA: a lot of the songs by a lot of women.
Marie Christine by Michael John LaChiusa: “Way Back to Paradise,” sung by Marie and Lisette, “Lover Bring Me Summer,” sung by Olivia and Grace.
The Music Man by Meredith Wilson: “Pickalittle (Talk-a-Little),” sung by Eulalie Mackecknie Shinn, Maud Dunlop, Ethel Toffelmier, Alma Hix, Mrs. Squires and the ladies of River City.*
The Phantom of the Opera by Andrew Lloyd Webber: “Angel of Music,” sung by Meg and Christine.
Rent by Jonathan Larson: “Take Me or Leave Me,” sung by Maureen and Joanne.
Repo! The Genetic Opera by Zdunich and Smith: “Chase the Morning,” sung by Mag, Shilo, and Marni.
The Sound of Music by Rogers and Hammerstein: “Maria,” sung by Sister Berthe, Sister Sophia, Sister Margaretta, and the Mother Abbess.
Spring Awakening by Sheik and Sater: “The Dark I Know Well,” sung by Martha and Ilse.*
Thoroughly Modern Millie by Tesori and Scanlan: “How the Other Half Lives,” sung by Millie and Miss Dorothy.
[title of show] by Bowen and Bell: “What Kind of Girl is She?” and “Secondary Characters,” sung by Susan and Heidi.
West Side Story by Leonard Bernstein: “America,” sung by Anita, Rosalia and the Shark girls.
Wicked: “What is This Feeling?,” “One Short Day,” “Defying Gravity,” and “For Good,” all sung by Elphaba and G(a)linda (with various accompaniment).*
The Wild Party by Michael John LaChiusa: “Best Friend,” sung by Queenie and Kate.
Wonderful Town by Comden and Green: “Ohio,” sung by Ruth and Eileen.
Xanadu by Lynne and Ferrar: “Strange Magic,” sung by Melpomene, Calliope and Kira.

–your fangirl heroine.

nonchalant liquor consumption

Theatre Thursday :: so I recently learned that I have West Side Story problems.

12 Jan

It’s been a long, long time since I saw the movie, and I have a couple of albums of it, but those never made me really go “what?”  And it’s not the fault of the performers.  They performed pretty brilliantly across the board.  And it’s not the fault of Leonard Bernstein’s score.  That’s also absolutely gorgeous.

I just have ridiculous problems with the show as a show.

This is probably because I have Romeo and Juliet problems.  I don’t believe in love at first sight.  Period.  I’m sure I’ve discussed this before, how “love at first sight” is really just chemical reactions in one’s brain; I don’t deny that you can be attracted to someone at first sight, and that this attraction can ultimately lead to love, but I don’t believe that it’s love in its truest form immediately.  I don’t believe that you can love someone until you know them.  Love is not just infatuation and attraction, it’s a connection to their personality.  Or it should be.  It should be all of these things combined.

And like Romeo and Juliet, Tony and Maria… are not in love.  I mean, they may have love feelings by the end of the play, and they definitely have “this could eventually be love” feelings, but Tony is so desperate to feel something new and Maria is so desperate to feel something that isn’t Chino that they mistake attraction and chemical sparkage for true love.

The premise just makes me sad.  That they feel like it’s a great idea to go get married after knowing each other for a day.  That they think that it’ll help their life problems.  It won’t.  They barely know each other.  They’re teenagers.  It can’t end well.

Also, some of the lyrics, now that I listen really closely?  Are absolutely ridiculous.  I mean, “Maria” and “Tonight” are absolutely gorgeous classic songs.  I don’t deny this.  But have you ever thought about the fact that “Something’s Coming” is an entire song about absolutely nothing?  The melody is gorgeous, the instrumentals are gorgeous, but holy wow.  And “Gee, Officer Krupke” serves a very specific point.  It’s dumbass boys being dumbasses.  (And, at least in this staging, simulating a lot of humping.)  But it’s a terrible song.  Even the orchestrations are ridiculous in that one.  An oom-pah band?  Really?

But the dancing was really, really pretty.  Tony had a nice voice (though it was pointed out to me that his speaking voice sounded like Ted on How I Met Your Mother, which ruined Act II for me).  Maria had a nice voice when she sang alone, together with other people she didn’t mix too well, but hey.  The set was neat.  And there was one girl in the chorus who I decided was my favorite: she had a high ponytail on top of her head, she was a Jet girl, she wore a tight cardigan and a pencil skirt and she had boobs.  And she danced pretty.

…yeah.  I just defiled an American classic with too much analysis.

–your fangirl heroine.

Television Tuesday :: insert witty Glee pun here.

12 Oct

I have 5 main subheadings for this post:

  1. I’m not done with Glee, but I’m… getting there.
  2. If Mercedes (Amber Riley) is pregnant, I am gonna cut a bitch.
  3. Can the entire program just be Mike’s (Harry Shum Jr.) dancing, Tina’s (Jenna Ushkowitz) clothes, Emma’s (Jayma Mays) adorableness, and Brittany (Heather Morris) saying funny things please?
  4. Marti Noxon my baby where are you?
  5. I just looked up the definition of “retcon” on Urban Dictionary, and I’m pretty sure that’s what they do to everyone every single episode.

I figured since there was no new Glee this week, I could discuss my feelings about the show and the season thus far without accidentally forgetting a new happening.  So I’ll address each subheading.

  1. Many of the reasons I mentioned for why Glee doesn’t suck earlier this year have kind of become stagnant.
    • Sue (Jane Lynch)?  Well, yes, there are funny one-liners.  Lynch delivers them well.  But really, woman.  You had a great emotional turn around the end of last season.  But the writers needed you around to be a raging bitch all the time, so they, well, retconned you.  And it’s getting old.  It really, really is.  The more jokes Sue tells, the more it feels like nagging.
    • I still appreciate what Chris Colfer did for people re: gayness and all.  And I still adore Darren Criss (mostly because he was singing Harry Potter).  But I’m just… kind of over Kurt and Blaine as characters.  And by “kind of” I mean really.  Kurt has been having the exact same emotional crisis over and over since season one, and I understand it, I do, but does he have to have some variation of it every single episode?  And Blaine just isn’t that interesting.  I understand that he could act Tony in their production of West Side Story better than Kurt could, I don’t doubt that, and I don’t think Kurt’s voice is right for Tony either, but Blaine… kind of isn’t rangy enough for it.  They had him sort of faking/fudging a few of the high notes.  And maybe that’s just me being neurotic, but I wasn’t really buying it.

    Also, a lot of the things that annoyed me always haven’t changed.

    • Rachel (Lea Michele) is still on my Fictional Women to Punch list.  I mean.  She’s a very good singer, I love all the vintage dresses she’s been wearing this season, she’s super cute.  But she’s frustrating.
    • Mercedes is also frustrating.  If I have to see her whinge about being second to Rachel one more time, I may scream.  It’s not that she’s not talented.  She is.  She and Rachel are both talented.  But they’re not like objects.  Mercedes would have been a subpar Maria in West Side Story for the same reason that Rachel would be, to use one of Mercedes’ favorite metaphors, a subpar Effie White in Dreamgirls.  Could the Glee Club come up with new songs to sing that could showcase what Mercedes does better than with a riffing trill at the last ten measures?  Yes.  But that’s not a reason to swear vengeance against Rachel (much).
    • Quinn (Dianna Agron) is also frustrating.  The whole diversion into the land of having dyed hair and smoking at the season’s beginning?  Pretty much pointless.  Quinn is one of those people that I feel bad for, but at the same time want to smack: yes, a lot of crap has happened to her.  She got pregnant, she gave up the baby, her boyfriend dumped her.  But at the same time… well, girl, get over it.  Giving up the baby was a smart decision, and she apparently forgot about it for an entire season, but now suddenly it bothers her again?  Her boyfriend would have dumped her no matter what: it’s high school.  People break up.  There are very few high school relationships that last.  WikiAnswers says it’s a 2% chance.
    • The writers are trying so hard to make it a show that embraces diversity and differences that it’s inadvertently a little bothersome.  I mean, we get it.  It’s wacky!  There are black kids!  There are geeky kids!  There are Hispanic kids!  There are stupid kids!  There are Asian kids!  For some reason, this one bothers me the most: it’s like when they were doing the bit in season one where everyone had their stereotypes drawn out of a hat and Tina and Mike were called “Asian” and “Other Asian,” they decide that that would be the only defining factor of their existences.  Not an episode seems to go by without an Asian joke or reference; last week’s episode was called “Asian F,” for crying out loud.  Apparently A minuses are Asian Fs; I had never heard that before.  But hey.
    • And speaking of embracing differences… you know a weird pattern I’ve noticed?  There can be an interracial hookup at the end of one season (Tina and Artie, Mercedes and Sam) but by the beginning of the next season, that nonwhite girl will be hooked up with a nonwhite guy.  I actually think Tina and Mike are adorable, so I’m not complaining from that standpoint, but really?  Once was weird but I could shrug it off; twice now with Mercedes dating an also-black football player?  Because they actually had to take Sam off the show?  (He was sort of boring, yeah, but sometimes he was a nerd and that was theoretically neat.)  Didn’t Mercedes express disinterest at Kurt’s offer to set her up with an also-black football player before?  And if said player loves her so much, he’d be willing to be in West Side Story and dance without bitching.
    • Why is it that all the main relationships go through the same pattern over and over?  I mean, Finn (Cory Monteith) and Rachel.  They’re secretly crushing on each other.  Then they’re dating.  Then they’re broken up.  Then they’re crushing again, and one or both of them has another love interest.  Then they’re dating again.  Then they’re broken up again.  Then they’re dating again.  I’m just counting the episodes till there’s tumult again.  Finn and Quinn, same story.  Will (Matthew Morrison) and Emma.  They’re secretly crushing on each other.  Then one or both of them has another love interest.  Then there’s a dramatic breakup.  Then they’re dating.  Then there are differences and they break up.  Then they’re interested in each other again.  I’m really hoping they stay together this time.  I mean, I kind of want to punch Will sometimes (he’s well-intentioned, but not always correct) but my punching desires are usually regarding things other than Emma.  Usually.  He seems to want to do right by Emma, and he makes her happy, I think, so that’s good enough for me.
    • If all of the Glee Project kids have as random of cameos as Lindsay did?  What, what, what even.
    • LET THE OTHER GIRLS HAVE SOLOS OCCASIONALLY.  They let Santana (Naya Rivera) and Brittany sing more, and that’s cool.  They let Mercedes sing more, which… see above.  I’m actually just talking about Tina, because… Tina.  Baby.  I love her, I always have, there are no reasons for it other than my need to latch onto the backgroundiest background characters with the best clothes and a morbid bent. I thought when they started dressing her in more colors this season that that would mean they’d let her sing more.  She’s less Goth and more Mod; I mean, I miss Goth Tina.  I do.  Especially last season neo-Victorian Goth Tina.  But Mod Tina is still cute, too.  And she does have a nice voice.  And I’m pretty sure she hasn’t sung a single line alone since the stupid Willy Wonka song in the funeral episode last season.
  2. This was something my dad brought up last week.  I didn’t think of it, but during the giant Dreamgirls dream sequence, he exclaimed, “Oh my god, Mercedes is pregnant, isn’t she.”  I… had to admit that it was a valid possibility.  She’s tired, she’s cranky, she feels sick.  But really, kids: we do not need another teenage pregnancy line on this show.  They beat that one into the ground.  The only way it would be at all different would be if it was like an I Didn’t Know I Was Pregnant kind of thing, and that would be really annoying too, so.  I actually suggested that she might have cancer or something instead; that would also be frustrating, but at least it would be different.  (And can I just talk about the Dreamgirls sequence for a minute?  Because that made me want to stab someone.  [This season of Glee is bringing out my theoretical violent impulses, apparently.]  At first I was like, “okay, dream sequence, wacky fun.”  But then my analysis hat kicked in: yes, Kurt should have been one of the other Dreamgirls.  Yes, Santana can sing it – though given the fact that she’d just rejoined Glee after being kicked out, she didn’t really have an emotional right.  Quinn did pretty much the same thing, and had just as little emotional right, and I thought Mercedes and Quinn were bonded for… no wait, just kidding, they completely forgot about that once season one ended and Quinn birthed her baby.  Tina could have been singing it.  She would have been a more emotionally appropriate Anika Noni Rose character, being the one who always gets neglected and backgrounded, but psh, we can’t let Tina have solos.  That would be crazy.  And why on Earth did they keep calling Mercedes Effie, but everyone else got referred to by their real life names?  And… okay, done.)
  3. This is straightforward.  Mike, Tina, Emma, and Brittany are the only characters I care about at all anymore.  “Asian F” was a frustrating episode for many reasons, but it was all worth it for Mike dancing.  (And Riff is a part that you can kind of talk-sing, so good choice, them.)  Tina, see above. Emma… is just too precious.  I don’t think they always have the right thing to do with her, but I think she’s darling.  And I just want to hug her always.  Brittany’s one-liners aren’t old yet.  They’re just so random and ridiculous; they’re not mean-spirited or bitchy or repetitive.  They’re just things that come out of her mouth that make no sense and yet make absolutely perfect sense.  And despite being pretty bookstupid, she’s very peoplesmart, and I honestly think she’s got a better head on her shoulders about people things than just about any of the other characters do.
  4. Marti Noxon was reported to be joining the writing and producing staff of Glee this season, and after this interview with her especially, I was giddy.  I mean… one of my Whedon mafia writer women who completely looks at it logically?  But she doesn’t even have a page on the Glee wiki yet.  She has not helped yet.
  5. Observe.
    retcon:
    1. (original meaning) Adding information to the back story of a fictional character or world, without invalidating that which had gone before.
    2. (more common usage) Adding or altering information regarding the back story of a fictional character or world, regardless of whether the change contradicts what was said before.  (urbandictionary.com)
    Retconning is something I generally frown at.  The example they give of Dawn on Buffy is actually a great one, and actually one that I’ve found myself adjusting to.  I mean, I still hate early Dawn.  But she became slightly less punchable by the end.  And she made for good plot things.  But on Glee it’s silly.  They keep trying to add to everyone’s lives and backstories and personalities and it’s like just leave it alone, people.  Season one was warm fuzzies because it was more genuine.  It wasn’t trying to please millions of teenagers.  (I read someone in Entertainment Weekly saying that it felt like last season’s Glee had been written on Twitter or something.  TRUE FACTS, kids.)  And it needs to go back to that.  The retconning needs to stop.

Sigh.  Sigh.  Sigh.  (And if Mercedes really is pregnant, which I want to doubt but cannot fully, I may actually have to stop watching altogether.)

–your fangirl heroine.

Music Monday :: in defense of The Hazards of Love

12 Jul

Yes, this particular album is… well, not that old, it’s from 2009, but still.  It’s definitely one of the albums I love the most, if not my current-and-for-at-least-a-year album, and it’s also pretty polarizing, amongst Decemberists fans and just regular folk alike.  Thus my titling this post “in defense,” because for whatever reason?  A lot of people… well, I hate to say “don’t get it,” because that sounds way hipster and snobby, but a lot of people just, I guess, aren’t into this kind of thing.

(This is the case with many things I love.  The entire musical theatre genre?  The films of Tarantino?  The works of Joss [well, Firefly I've yet to meet a non-fan IRL, but Buffy some people aren't into, and I know that at least on the interwebs there were a ton of Dollhouse -- not naysayers, necessarily, though there were some -- but again people who weren't necessarily on board?  The genre of comic books?  RepoSucker Punch?  B-horror movies?  Bloody deaths?  Corseting?  My particular mancrushes [actually, some of the ladycrushes, too, probably]?  It’s something I’m used to, but even still, like the adamant fangirl I am, I must jump to defenses of everything that is part of my heart.)

Unlike the vast majority of albums ever, Hazards is, well.  According to Wikipedia it’s a “rock opera.”  (See why I was big with the loving from the start?)  Others might call it a “concept album,” which also according to Wikipedia citing Roy Shuker is an album “unified by a theme, which can be instrumental, compositional, narrative, or lyrical.”  Things like the Beatles’ Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, or The Who’s Tommy, or Pink Floyd’s The Dark Side of the Moon and The Wall, or Green Day’s now-theaterized American Idiot or 21st Century Breakdowm.  Concept albums.  Which are often also rock operas, but “concept album” just sits better with the masses, doesn’t it?

Hazards is also a love story.  Which shouldn’t be that weird for people, right?  I mean, the majority of popular and non-popular music alike is about love.  Of course, most of it isn’t quite in so much detail, spending an entire album telling the love story between a maiden and a “shape-shifting boreal forest dweller” (also Wikipedia) in an unspecified olden days time.  Most is just “ooh, baby baby, I love you” or if it’s getting cruder maybe “grind that ass sexy bitch” or something.  There aren’t even too many songs nowadays that tell this detailed of a story.  (Unsurprisingly, many examples I could cite are also Decemberists’ work: “The Mariner’s Revenge Song” being my best and favorite, but much of The Crane Wife, also.)  But these lovers, who meet in true tragic style and consummate the relationship right away, leaving Margaret (sung by Becky Stark of the band Lavender Diamond) preggers, which in turn forces her to leave the… maiden’s home (?) where she lives to go find him.

And it’s a love story with conflict that doesn’t just come from someone’s cheating ex or something.  Said shape-shifter, William (sung by frontman and god of indie Colin Meloy) has a fairy queen mother who is downright evil and freaky.  She’s sung by Shara Worden of the band My Brightest Diamond and hot freakety damn can that woman sing.  And that fairy queen mother is a jealous freaking bitch.  So she hires a man known simply as the Rake (also sung by Meloy, tapping into his treacherous creeper vibe) to kidnap Margaret and prevent the lovers from being together.  He is a massive creeper, though; in “The Rake’s Song,” track 10, he basically sings a happy little ditty about his wife dying in childbirth and his subsequent murdering of his three children so he could go off and screw whores.

A lot of pop songs sing about promiscuity, to varying effect (and I judge only their lack of poetry; as far as I’m concerned, they can go do whatever if they’re safe about it, just think of something more interesting to sing about it).  But it takes a special group like the Decemberists to sing about filicide to facilitate promiscuity.  Actually, I’m pretty sure I haven’t heard another group sing about filicide, period.  Maybe a rap song that mentions some kid getting shot in a drive-by, but not a father poisoning, drowning, and burning his kids.

And Margaret and William’s is a tragic love, as mentioned, so obviously it’s not going to work out for them.  This is another thing I love.  I understand that it’s standard tragic fare, but even the genius that is West Side Story had to leave at least Maria alive.  And for the sweet love of God, how many popular references are there to Romeo and Juliet in a happy “isn’t love swell?” context nowadays?  Tragedy is as old as time, but a lot of people don’t have the balls to deal with it fully nowadays.  Sure, there are hella depressing break-up songs all over the place, songs so maudlin they necessitate my saying “hella,” but a love story where both of the lovers die isn’t on everyone’s pop hits.

But the Decemberists aren’t everyone’s pop hits.  Their style has always been unique; again Wikipedia categorizes them as “indie rock,” “folk rock,” “art rock,” “progressive rock,” “alt-country,” and my favorite, “baroque pop.”  (Okay, so “alt-country” applies more to other albums an less to this one.)  Hazards is “baroque pop” at its finest.  You have unusual topics.  Hyperpoetic lyrics.  Organs and upright basses and thanks to goddess Jenny Conlee accordions.  Basically, weird-ass stuff.  Old-fashioned stuff.  But done in a way that feels newish.  And a hell of a lot more morbid than… oh, everything else.

I think this is part of my love for this album, honestly, because I’m a little bit deranged that way (as evidenced by my above list of interests).  It’s morbid.  A lot of musicals tell stories, but there’s a blessed few that are morbid (my baby Spring Awakening fills the morbid quota, oh yeah; I like to think that the ghosts of the Rake’s children and Moritz and Wendla get to be ghost-buddies in ghost Europe, ’cause I’m just like that).  A lot of operas tell stories, and some of those are morbid, but, y’know, they’re in other languages, so while I know what’s going on thanks to synopses and can appreciate the musical and vocal elements, it’s not quite the same.  But here you not only have the Rake murdering his kids.  You have the Queen basically taking a hit out on her son’s lover.  You have the Rake abusing the hell out of poor Margaret.  You have said ghosts (spoiler) coming back to drive their dad to his doom.  You have an epic drowning.

Similar to my rant on using Romeo and Juliet in pop songs (I’m sure this will be a list later), the tragic love of a pair who meets, screws, and is in Love could piss me off royally.  I don’t believe in love at first sight, usually.  I believe in attraction at first sight, certainly; love has to grow.  But Margaret and William at least experience attraction and connection at first sight, and through their experiences are bonded.  I think when they drown epically, they’re in love, finally.  They’ve earned the right to be.  And they haven’t been frustrating as all get-out in the process of falling in love, so that helps, too.

Also, let’s talk about the children ghosts for a minute.  Because.  CHILDREN GHOSTS.  VENGEFUL CHILDREN GHOSTS.  Rarely have I found something so epic even in theory in a song.  And their “The Hazards of Love 3 (Revenge!)” is a creepy-ass awesome tune.  I mean, all of the tunes here are amazing.  “Won’t Want for Love,” Margaret’s first lament, is beautiful.  The Queen’s “Repaid” is dramatic perfection.  But there’s just… something about creepy-ass children ghosts singing, man.

I get why people aren’t into this.  Baroque pop so isn’t everyone’s style, and an album with a plotline that requires attention to be paid to it isn’t either.  But for all of the reasons I love it, basically, it’s not the kind of thing everyone’s gonna grab onto.  Baroque pop concept albums about tragic love and fairy queens and children ghosts aren’t necessarily aimed at the masses.  I realize this, I accept this.  (I have a harder time accepting Decemberists fans who for some indistinct reason just don’t get attached to the album; I mean, I don’t expect everyone to have listened to it at least 300 times, but really?  It’s classic Decemberists.  It’s weird older stuff and instruments and lyrics and Colin Meloy and guest artists.  It shouldn’t be that strange.  It’s definitely different from, say, The King is Dead, but they’re both brilliant.)  But don’t be scared off, kids.  If you haven’t listened to this album before, just… try it?  For me?

–your fangirl heroine.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers