Archive | March, 2012

Fictional Friday :: Comicon, day 1.

31 Mar

AKA, a series of pictures of various people dressed as fictional characters from Comicon, where the strangers’ faces are blurred out for politeness and the people I know IRL are unblurred (and yes, you will recognize two of them from my other cosplay adventures).  If any of you strangers see this and want your blurred self removed, please feel free to say so; I’m not trying to creep, just to praise your awesome.

As per Mercury was my favorite Sailor Scout, and Neptune is classy too.

Ash Ketchum and some (sexy?) Pokemon.

Harley Quinn and Poison Ivy are my favorites.

A whole slew of Batman villains plus Batman.  Whose face I didn’t blur as per he’s wearing a giant mask.  There are two Harleys here, different ones, and please let me point out the lady!Joker.  Hell, yes.

Here’s me and my fellow Captain Hammer groupie best friend with the above Harley.  Which… is kind of interesting.

Our friend, who is Captain Hammer, having a Nathan Fillion party with a fellow dressed as Mal.

Our group: Penny and Captain Hammer.

And of course, Captain Hammer has his groupies.  Yes.

–your fangirl heroine.

Things in Print Thursday :: comics to read before you die?

29 Mar

I was hoping there was a neat list online, maybe 10-50 comics, but almost everything I found was a link to a proper book: 1001 Comics You Must Read Before You Die: The Ultimate Guide to Comic Books, Graphic Novels and Mangaedited by Paul Gravett.  The Amazon notes are… mixed to say the least, and I’m sure it’s a relative case like any ___ to ___ before you die list.

Being somewhat of a comics newbie like I am, I will say that I’m sure I haven’t read the majority of the 1001 comics listed.  I’m sure I haven’t.  But even as a comics newbie (who mostly just reads Dark Horse spinoffs because I’m afraid that I don’t know where to begin otherwise) I am interested in acquiring this volume and doing my best to chip away at this list.

I also found a list of 6 graphic novels to read before you die, at natashalarrywrites.blogspot.com.  Half of the listed volumes are Batman-related, so I’m not sure if it’s particularly unbiased, but Watchmen is on there.  I’m on board with that.  Watchmen is wonderful, fascinating, and, you know.  Really damn cool.  The only Batman comic I’ve ever read is The Killing Joke, which isn’t on the list, but is fantastic.  All of the volumes on the list are Frank Miller creations, which means I will read them at some point; I am a fan of Frank Miller.  I also realize that Sin City is not for everyone, but I love it to pieces.

In short… I will be buying more comics this weekend.  Yes.  And I’ll gladly take recommendations.

–your fangirl heroine.

Whedon Wednesday :: the lamest excuse for posting, part 1.

28 Mar

As per I am getting ready for Emerald City Comicon this weekend, and am covered in paint and thread and the exasperated dreams of homemade corsets, I’m just copping out of actually posting tonight.  Instead, if you haven’t watched this yet, please God do. 

(It’s the most recent Cabin in the Woods trailer, so it’s super relevant.)

–your fangirl heroine.

Television Tuesday :: 18 months is too long.

27 Mar

I’m speaking, of course, about this Sunday’s premiere of Mad Men‘s fifth season.  As evidenced by both my Sunday giddiness and my frequent mentions of the show’s other seasons on this blog, I’m sure you can all imagine exactly how I was feeling about it.  Namely, every positive emotion.

Mad Men is one of those shows where I actually dislike a lot of the characters sometimes.  But then they do something that makes me like them, and then they do something that makes me dislike them again, and then I like them again, and… you just can’t actually decide for sure.  (Except for sometimes: I like Joan [Christina Hendricks] always, obviously.  I like Peggy [Elisabeth Moss] always.  But.)  I sort of love that, though.  I love that everyone is so complicated that you can’t know how you feel about them, but you can’t help but care about them even still.

This is a bullet-pointed list of thoughts that don’t spoil anything too serious, because I want everyone who would to watch it for themselves.  (Everyone who doesn’t, go ahead and skip this.  As I’m sure you always do when the post does not pertain to your interests.)

  • I just finished an epic all-four-seasons rewatch.  I did.  But before this episode, I’d honestly forgotten how hilarious this show can sometimes be.  Or maybe everyone had just turned their sarcasm dial up to eleven now because they all feel like they could get away with it now.  I don’t know.  It was two hours of nonstop sixties snark, and it made me so so happy.  Peggy snarking, Don (Jon Hamm) snarking, Joan snarking, Pete (Vincent Kartheiser) snarking.
  • The standoff with Roger (John Slattery) and Pete.  Oh, my gosh.  Spoiler: telling his secretary to pencil in a fake appointment at six in the morning so Roger would show up to it and get his.  Then “some of us are above that kind of trick” and the look.  The smug, knowing look: smug because he got one over on Roger, knowing because Roger sure wasn’t going to tell the others what happened, since it would make him look like a fool.
  • This Roger who is sans responsibility is just hanging around the office all day acting like a sarcastic asshole, and that’s simultaneously terrible (for everyone else who has to deal with them) and sort of amusing (for everyone that’s watching).  I don’t really like Roger as a character, I never have, but he’s amusing, so that’s something.
  • So I guess Megan (Jessica Paré) and Don did get married.  Since they’re now living in a supercool sixties apartment together and wearing wedding rings.  Given Don’s history of being terrible at relationships (and to a lesser extent the happenings of the episode and how I’m sure that’s reflective of the rest of the time) I don’t entirely know how well it will happen, but Megan seems much more prone to not taking his b.s. and snarking right back at him.
  • And… passive-aggressively stripping and cleaning.  Was that a one-time thing or a usual thing with them?  I don’t know.  Hm.
  • Megan’s party.  So many thoughts.  Apparently she’s friends with all sorts of 1960s quasihipsters?  And she’s approximately 1/5 of a quasihipster herself, given her mod hair and mod eyeliner and tiny dress and singing like she did.  Apparently the song is now a thing for people to discuss online, so I won’t, much, except for to say I was just trying to translate the lyrics as I heard them and failing miserably because my French is paltry at best.
  • But oh mydear sweet lord, Lane (Jared Harris) imitating her dancing for Joan in the office.  Oh my dear sweet lord.  I’m not sure I’ve been so close to literally rotfl-ing in the recent past.  I love when British people dance or are sarcastic or dance in a sarcastic fashion.
  • I do not love when British people that are Lane creep on a picture found in a lost wallet.  That was sketchy.  That was a :( moment for me, but then the dancing and Lane’s general way with Joanie put me back on the :) side of things, and I had to like him again.
  • This is the paragraph devoted to Joan: she wears glasses sometimes and I love when she wears glasses.  (Completely necessary italics.)  She had the baby.  Nobody knows it’s Roger’s, and it’s a boy.  (Kevin…?  I choose to believe that the name was Greg’s idea, and will until told otherwise, because I don’t like that name.  But I want Kevin and Tammy Campbell to be buddies. I want Sally to babysit them.  I want all the Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce children to hang out.)  Also, every time anyone flops desperately on a bed, I think of Kiki’s Delivery Service, but I also think of how it is such a perfect representation of a feeling that everyone has.  Also, my Joanie loves her son, but she also loves working.  I feel like Joan’s line to Peggy in season one is a perfect picture of her:
    “Although sometimes when people get what they want, they realize how limited their goals were.”
    I think Joan has realized how limited her goal of marriage+baby was — not in general, and some people are happy with that life, but Joan herself is not.  She enjoys work, and she needs it in her life.  Mommy Joan would be happier being Working Mommy Joan.  And I love this about her.  And I love that Lane acknowledges that she is so very necessary.  And I love when she’s buddies with the others in the office.  And I… love her.  Surprise.
  • Also, Christine Estabrook as Joan’s mother.  Not really contradictory to my headcanon, nope, so that’s good.  And Christine Estabrook is a perfect mother-who-needs-to-impart-b.s.-gender-roles-on-her-daughter.
  • Also, let’s talk about Peggy.  Peggy is a badass and is perfect.  Peggy is sometimes sarcastic, sometimes businesslike, sometimes self-deprecating, sometimes drunk and chatty and sarcastic again, sometimes friendly, always awesome.
  • Megan and Peggy seem to have become friends, ish.  Except for the part where Megan also seems like… a cranky optimist?  She doesn’t like everyone’s negative attitudes, and she doesn’t believe they’re necessary, but she also seems to believe that people don’t generally suck.  …meliorism?  Maybe?
  • And also, Don’s comment to the kids about Betty (January Jones) and Henry’s (Christopher Stanley) new house.  “Give my regards to Lurch and Morticia.”  Or something like that.  Brilliant snark, because really, my people were all looking at the house when they pulled up and saying things like “so Betty and Henry moved to a mausoleum?”  In retrospect, I’m also reminded of the Haunted Mansion, but the one at Disney World, not the one at Disneyland.
  • Basically, all the feelings.  And also all the excitement about the season.

–your fangirl heroine.

Music Monday :: The Hunger Games… soundtrack?

26 Mar

It’s not a soundtrack in the strictest sense, no.  Basically, the album recently released that is full of folksyindustrialtwangywhatnot is an official fanmix.  Instead of fanmixes in the sense like I make them, where you take a bunch of songs that already exist and pile them together, the producers of this particular soundtrack took a bunch of artists that have some aesthetic similarities and then said “hey, create songs that are vaguely relevant to this theme!!”

I’m not arguing this particular point.  Obviously, I am an advocate of the fanmix, and I am an advocate of many of the involved artists.  Neko Case, the Civil Wars, the Decemberists, Glen Hansard.  All of whom make me go yes.

I am arguing the involvement of the songs in the movie, or rather the lack of involvement.  When you’re fighting battles in the woods, what would you rather: generic action movie music, or instrumentalized segments of twangy industrial tunes?  Me personally, I’d rather that.  Folksy anything is better to me basically always.  And especially here: I mean, the generic action music was relevant to the Capitol, it sounded appropriate there, but in District 12 or in the Arena, it was more folksytwang time.  They’re working in the mines, they’re fighting in the woods, they’re taking care of business.

This is a fairly short post, I suppose.  But this is my plea to the producers of the movies: next time, actually twang it up a little.  Some of those battle/camping montages could have been even better with some badass Decemberists tunes or something.  And in the plaintive moments, I kept thinking they’d pipe in strains of “Safe and Sound” or something.  Just a hint.  Lyrics not even necessary.  Twang is just more effective, all right?

–your fangirl heroine.

Sundry Sunday :: my urban dictionary: fan relief

25 Mar

Def.: That moment when something (often but not always [long-]awaited; also something [surprisingly] positive) happens in fandom.  This can apply to something happening in the fandom, as in something being released or announced; it can apply to something happening in fandom, as in in the canon’s continuity; this can apply to anything in between.

Usage: After eighteen months, tonight’s premiere of Mad Men caused everyone who is emotionally invested in it no small measure of fan relief; throughout the episode, and usually correlating with things said to/by my Joanie [Christina Hendricks], I had smaller personal bouts of fan relief as well.

–your fangirl heroine.

Spoiler Alert Saturday :: my thoughts on The Hunger Games

24 Mar

Let’s just get to it.

  • FIRST THINGS FIRST, Century Gothic (or maybe a variant, I couldn’t say for 100%) does not make an appropriate title card to describe why Panem has the Hunger Games.  I’m not saying they needed something as grungy and strange as, like, 1942 report (that’s better for headings/decoration than textblocks, anyway).  But Century Gothic is far too clean and tidy.  Century Gothic is like the IKEA of fonts: it’s clean, it’s simple, it’s straightforward, but it lacks any necessary something.  And not even in the weird Capitol way.  (Yes, this matters.)
  • Jennifer Lawrence: competent, badass, adorable.  (Okay, so the latter is also part I like her face and part I have a thing for blue-eyed brunettes and part I find socially awkward badasses adorable.)  Honestly, I do like Katniss at the beginning of the book/movie.  She’s just a girl who’s better with hunting than with social conventions who does the brave thing because it’s right and she’s gutsy, not to have honor or glory or something.  She’s not brave to make a point, she’s brave because she doesn’t feel like she has an alternative.  And that’s good.
  • Also, Katniss Everdeen is a Browncoat.  Just sayin’.  (I mean, I do collect fictional characters wearing brown leather coats now, but also emotionally.)
  • Liam Hemsworth: apparently competent, made a lot of broody faces.  I don’t think I’ve really gotten into my Gale-Katniss-Peeta feelings before, but really… just no.  I understand their function in the narrative, but I also could have understood a narrative that functioned completely without that.  “Are you pro-Gale or pro-Peeta?” one of my people asked.  (I was there with three others: one who had also read the books, two who hadn’t.)  “I refuse to say ‘team.’”  “I’m pro-Katniss said she didn’t want to get married, so she shouldn’t have to get sucked into that gǒ se.”  I’m not pro-Gale because he’s sullen and not in an interesting way; I’m not pro-Peeta because I just can’t be.
  • Josh Hutcherson: pretty competent, made a lot of O_O and also :O and D: faces.  Having the movie be, well, a movie, having it be sans voiceover, really did help somewhat: it wasn’t all the random that goes on in Katniss’ head, which is good at first but devolves into ridiculous once it becomes a love story.  So it was a bit easier to see the ~conflicted~ nature of Peeta, as opposed to Katniss’ paranoia/affection/worry/whatever.
  • Paula Malcomson: had nothing to do.  She wore prairie clothes and looked shocked for a generous total of five minutes.  Which doesn’t surprise me; I mean, Katniss’ mom doesn’t get to do much in the book.  (She doesn’t even have a name, for goodness’ sake.)  But I would have liked a flash of “oh, hello, I am a competent healer” somewhere in there.  Well, no, time being what it is, I understand why it was left out.  But Mrs. Everdeen really does get the short end of the stick in a lot of ways.
  • Tributes: well, all right.  Cato (Alexander Ludwig) was a d-bag.  Clove (Isabelle Fuhrman) was a d-bag.  Glimmer (Leven Rambin) was like cracked-out, bloodthirsty Galinda with a bow and arrow.  Foxface (Jacqueline Emerson) reminded me too much of Sophie Turner at times, and then I sat there and imagined Sansa getting to badass it up, and that was distracting, but not in a bad way.  Rue (Amandla Stenberg) was tiny and allegedly meaningful.  Not really that well-developed, but again, timing.
  • Wes Bentley:  best/worst/most insane beard of all time?  And also his programmer minions: touchscreen semi-3D hologram computers rarely lead to good.
  • Also, where was any of the soundtrack?  I guess I just must not have done my research correctly, because while I knew a lot of the songs on the soundtrack wouldn’t actually be in the film, I thought a few would.  I thought that the score would at least match the folksy twangy badass vibe of the album.  And I honestly think that folksy twangy badass scoring (which picked up once they were in the Arena, but still) would have improved on many of the awkward silences/awkward mostly-silences-except-for-allegedly-dramatic-sustained-notes-in-sequence.  I stayed through almost the end of the credits just to hear the two songs that did play out; I mean, I don’t like Taylor Swift normally, but + the Civil Wars, I can forgive her, and also just the Civil Wars by themselves are always love.
  • This first in the series is about 85% action/camping, 15% love b.s.; the second is about 60%/40%; the third is about 20%/80%.  That is my imprecise analysis, directly correlating to why I like the first one best.
  • This is a story/series/book/movie/whatever that just lacks subtlety.  So hard.
  • I’m snarking here, but it was a good movie.  It was a faithful adaptation, save a few details that were skipped/unelaborated on.  Everyone did a good job, and Jennifer Lawrence is gifted at staring dramatically.  A lot of my issues are just ones that I had with the books or with strange nitpicky technicalities.  But I did enjoy myself, and it was well-done and nicely shot and fairly engaging, and that’s good.  I just want changes in the source material the more and more I think about them.

–your fangirl heroine.

Fashion Friday :: as April 1 approaches, I get more and more excited…

23 Mar

…and I channel this excitement by creating ridiculous character-inspired collections of ModCloth (etc.) photographs.

April 1 means season 2 of Game of Thrones, and I’m nerding for it wholeheartedly.  The most so, honestly, for Daenerys (Emilia Clarke).  I love her.  I really, really do.  So, here’s a… somewhat cutesy adaptation of badass Dany bein’ badass?

(The browns aren’t going to match the picture, obviously, but they’re brown.  And anyway, they’re not muddy, so that’s part of it.)

Because it is impossible to find tops that suit, I’m instead pairing a really basic, straightforward tank top in an appropriate shade of brown with a belt in a… different shade of brown.  This is like Dany the semi-hipster/hippie college student (and oh gosh, it’s hard for me to construct this, given my thing about shades of brown, but hey.  In this context I’m all right.)  Be a Good Sport Tank in Cocoa and Securely Stylish Belt, ModCloth.

Cutesier, less bedraggled, less muddy.  But at least it’s still the same shape idea, ish?  I assume that semi-hipster/hippie college Dany would be tucking that tank top into the similarly shaded skirt, then using the belt to break it up so it was sort of like a dress that wasn’t.  Rising to the Occasion Skirt, ModCloth.

But, uhm, the boots match the belt, sort of?  Maybe?  And they’re all leather and buckles and badassery, so it works.  Wasn’t Acorn Yesterday Boots, ModCloth.

So this is nothing like the pictured ring.  The only thing it has in common is that it’s a ring.  But if it’s semi-hipster/hippie college Dany, of course she’s putting a bird on it.  Cage Presence Ring, ModCloth.

And I couldn’t find a little round pin (it’s pretty specific, so I’m not surprised), so instead, semi-hipster/hippie Dany will rock some slightly more statement jewelry just because she can.  In the Mirror Future Necklace, ModCloth.

–your fangirl heroine.

Theatre Thursday :: a play-by-play of the 100 longest-running Broadway shows of all time

22 Mar

Italics if I’ve seen them staged, bold if I’ve seen them filmed, underlined if it was professional, *asterisked* if I was in it during my ridiculous adolescent theatrical career, linked if I’ve reviewed it live on here before.

The Phantom of the Opera (all of the feelings.  Phantom and I have a history wrought with many metaphors.)
Chicago (the revival; this was my eighth grade birthday party, as we remember.  One where I actually like the movie better than the stage production, surprisingly.)
Les Miserables
A Chorus Line
The Lion King (which I love as a cartoon, and the stage show was impressive, but the erotic tree ballet still freaks me out)
Beauty and the Beast
Rent (also all of the feelings.  Rent and I have another one of those metaphor histories.)
42nd Street (the revival)
Wicked (and more of those metaphors and whatnot.)
Fiddler on the Roof* (yes, I’m… done with this show forever.)
Hello, Dolly!
My Fair Lady
Hairspray (oh, junior high.  That cast album was my favorite.)
Avenue Q (and yet more metaphors.)
The Producers
Annie
Man of La Mancha
Mary Poppins
Oklahoma!
*
Smokey Joe’s Cafe (really?  This is one of the 100 longest running shows?  Really?  It doesn’t even have a plot.)
Hair
Spamalot
Evita
Dreamgirls
Billy Elliot
The King and I
Guys and Dolls
In the Heights
The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee
Kiss Me, Kate
Annie Get Your Gun

32 out of 100 shows seen.

I honestly thought I’d get more of the list.  None of the plays (I’ve read some, but).  It probably doesn’t help that I haven’t even heard of some of the shows, the ones from the 20s-70s especially.  But hey.  I guess it’s a new life goal.

–your fangirl heroine.

Whedon Wednesday :: the spectacularly speculative Dollhouse minor characters MBTI

21 Mar

I saw an absolutely wonderful Dollhouse MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) chart on tumblr a ways back.  And as I often do, I went to go Myers-Briggs type myself immediately and then match my own self up with someone’s scores.  But then I realized that nobody I usually type out as was on the original chart, and I realized why that was: I have an unhealthy affinity for minor characters.  (Every MBTI I took online varied slightly, but I ended up being either Claire, Adelle, or Tony; this didn’t surprise me much, as far as results could have gone.)  I then swore that I was going to make my own, imitative MBTI chart for the minor characters of Dollhouse.  Because I’m compulsive like that.

(And I had forgotten my letter results when I typed the characters out, so there was no cheating, but now went back to check; yep.  Unsurprisingly, I found that, while it varied, I got “a slightly different result but the I and the J are always the same.  It just varies N/S, F/T,” and that means that depending on the test, I type out a la Mellie or Bennett [or Dom, which I don't see, or Ivy, which I do see].  Je suis predictable.)

So now, I present to you said chart, with analyses of the types quoted out and thanks to typelogic.com.  A lot of the decisions made were severely driven by headcanon, because these characters appear in between 2-15 episodes, and 5 of them don’t even have (canonical) last names.  But hey, headcanon is what I do.

Laurence Dominic (Reed Diamond)
ISTJ.  “ISTJs are often called inspectors. They have a keen sense of right and wrong, especially in their area of interest and/or responsibility… As do other Introverted Thinkers, ISTJs often give the initial impression of being aloof and perhaps somewhat cold. Effusive expression of emotional warmth is not something that ISTJs do without considerable energy loss.  ISTJs are most at home with ‘just the facts, Ma’am’… ‘We’ve always done it this way’ is often reason enough for many ISTJs.”  Dom’s role so often was that of the cranky, all-too-professional guy, the one with a stick right up his ass; I think terms like “initial impression” are key, though, because I’m sure that he’s got other sides, somewhere deep inside.

Ivy (Liza Lapira)
INFJ.  “Beneath the quiet exterior, INFJs hold deep convictions about the weightier matters of life… These are the people that you can rarely fool any of the time. Though affable and sympathetic to most, INFJs are selective about their friends. Such a friendship is a symbiotic bond that transcends mere words… Introverted intuitives, INFJs enjoy a greater clarity of perception of inner, unconscious processes than all but their INTJ cousins. Just as SP types commune with the object and ‘live in the here and now’ of the physical world, INFJs readily grasp the hidden psychological stimuli behind the more observable dynamics of behavior and affect… ”  Once again, I love Ivy.  And I never once got the “difficult time connecting with people” vibe from her like Topher and Bennett both radiate at times; rather, I took her for the type who connects when it makes sense to them.  She doesn’t need to connect with everyone, but she’ll be, well, “affable and sympathetic to most.”

Zone (Zack Ward)
ESTP.  “ESTPs are spontaneous, active folks. Like the other SPs, ESTPs get great satisfaction from acting on their impulses. Activities involving great power, speed, thrill and risk are attractive to the ESTP… To an ESTP, admission of weakness feels like failure. He admires strength in himself and in others.   ‘Shock effect’ is a favored technique of this type to get the attention of his audience… These are the ultimate realists. Extraverted Sensors are at one with objects and experiences now, in the only living, pulsing moment that ever really exists… The ESTP preference for mental, physical and emotional toughness surely can be traced to this detached, rational function.”  I don’t know if Zone was always an ESTP, but years of thoughtpocalypse can do that to a person.  “Spontaneous, active” sounds more like a pre-thoughtpocalypse him (or what I imagine of him) but “ultimate realist” is more of a during-thoughtpocalypse him.  He’s the voice of cranky reason among the Actuals, when he’s not busy being the voice of morbid humor.

Mellie (Miracle Laurie)
ISFJ.  “ISFJs are characterized above all by their desire to serve others, their ‘need to be needed’… (Since ISFJs, like all SJs, are very much bound by the prevailing social conventions, their form of ‘service’ is likely to exclude any elements of moral or political controversy; they specialize in the local, the personal, and the practical.)  ISFJs are often unappreciated, at work, home, and play. Ironically, because they prove over and over that they can be relied on for their loyalty and unstinting, high-quality work, those around them often take them for granted–even take advantage of them… They are capable of forming strong loyalties, but these are personal rather than institutional loyalties… Like most Is, ISFJs have a few, close friends. They are extremely loyal to these, and are ready to provide emotional and practical support at a moment’s notice… ISFJs are loyal to the end; there is no sense of purely objective (i.e., impersonal) judgement of anyone but themselves (and that only by their own standards).”  I considered typing Madeline; the original chart used Dolls’ original personalities when applicable.  But though we get to meet Madeline, we know Mellie much, much better.  So.  Mellie is loyal as can be, and I love her for it.

Cindy Perrin (Stacey Scowley)
ESTJ.  “Being extraverted, their focus involves organization of people, which translates into supervision. While ENTJs enjoy organizing and mobilizing people according to their own theories and tactically based agendas, ESTJs are content to enforce ‘the rules,’  often dictated by tradition or handed down from a higher authority…  Circumstances calling for product invite the ESTJ to supervise or direct other individuals toward production and productivity… As the ESTJ matures, and as situations arise which call for suspension of criticism, Extraverted iNtuition is allowed to play. Under the leadership of the Te function, iNtuition gravitates toward the discovery of broad categories which at worst amount to stereotypes.”  This is mostly based on the personality she exudes; there’s no way of knowing that she’s really that way or if it’s just part of the Cindy Perrin act.  Hell, we don’t even know if her real name is Cindy.  But between Cindy and the glimpses we get of bitter-handler-who-might-be-Cindy, this is my humble analysis.

Kilo (Maurissa Tancharoen)
ENTP.  “ENTPs are usually verbally as well as cerebrally quick, and generally love to argue–both for its own sake, and to show off their debating skills. ENTPs tend to have a perverse sense of humor as well, and enjoy playing devil’s advocate… Both at work and at home, ENTPs are very fond of ‘toys’ — physical or intellectual, the more sophisticated the better. Once these have been “solved” or become too familiar, however, they’ll be replaced with new ones… ENTPs may sometimes give the impression of being largely oblivious to the rest of humanity except as an audience: good, bad, or potential… No games – they’ll win. No ‘pulling rank’ – they’ll just want to put you in your place… Their limitations appear in their relative underdevelopment, diminished endurance, and vulnerability… ENTPs have the need to have areas of expertise/excellence/uniqueness in which one is second to none.”  Holy wow, here’s all the headcanon, I warned you.  Kilo is one of those with 2 episodes; technically, it’s 3, but I figure since 2 of them are Dollstated one-liners, they count each as .5 of an appearance.  And the MBTI analysis is based pretty solely on techhead Kilo, anyway.  How much of that is original to her and how much is affected by the tech and the surroundings is debatable.

Mag (Felicia Day)
ESFJ.  “Strong, contradictory forces consume the ESFJ. Their sense of right and wrong wrestles with an overwhelming rescuing, ‘mothering’ drive. This sometimes results in swift, immediate action taken upon a transgressor, followed by stern reprimand; ultimately, however, the prodigal is wrested from the gallows of their folly, just as the noose tightens and all hope is lost, by the very executioner!… The world is a dangerous place, not to be trusted. Not that the ESFJ is paranoid; ‘hyper-vigilant’ would be more precise. And thus they serve excellently as protectors… At any rate, ESFJs reflect the ‘black and white’ view of reality which is common to the SJ types.” Mag.  I love her a lot, too.  I really, really do.  I mean, this is mostly speculative, but she does seem to be the mom-figure of the Actuals, taking care of them all in her way.  I see her as the type that, pre-thoughtpocalypse, was only shy about things she didn’t want to talk about with everyone, but was pretty outgoing at times.  She was a sociology major for crying out loud.

Daniel Perrin (Alexis Denisof)
ENTJ.  “ENTJs have a natural tendency to marshall [sic] and direct. This may be expressed with the charm and finesse of a world leader or with the insensitivity of a cult leader. The ENTJ requires little encouragement to make a plan… In combination with the natural propensity for filibuster, our hero can make it very difficult for the customer to decline… Improvising on the fly is something many ENTJs do very well. As Thinking’s subordinate, insights are of value only insofar as they further the Right, True Cause celebre.”  This based, obviously, on the fictionalized Daniel Perrin of the imprints, not the original party boy.  We’re analyzing all the imprints tonight.  And by all I mean 2-3.

Bennett Halverson (Summer Glau)
INTJ.  “INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest… INTJs are known as the ‘Systems Builders’ of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability… While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations. This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense.”  Why is this copypaste so damn lengthy?  Because it was so damn relevant.  And because I have all the headcanon.  It fit her so neatly.

–your fangirl heroine.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 61 other followers